Holding on to a Building or Selling It
Published on Thursday, 17 April 2014 16:19:01 Written by Marc
Any company that has a portfolio of sites that they either lease or own, gets constantly faced with the question of whether or not it should keep a particular site or let it go. If the site is leased, it becomes a matter of either subleasing it (or trying to) until the end of the lease period and then giving back the keys to the landlord. If the site is owned, the choices pretty much boil down to leasing it or selling it. Depending on the nature of the company, the choices should in theory be easy to make: if you are not in the real estate business and own a site, you no longer need, simply sell it.
Not Always so Obvious The simplistic approach to the question of holding on to a building or selling it does not always work, simply because there are a number of situations which would make for a company to want to keep a building, even if their business is not remotely close to the real estate business. Let us look at a few reasons why:
- You might need the site in the future. This is probably the number one reason why companies not in the real estate business would want to keep a building even if they no longer have a need for it for their operations. It might be that the building is in good condition and well located and you think that in the future there is a possibility that the building will be needed again. This happens even more when buildings have been customized for specific operations. Whenever companies install their manufacturing operations, there are numerous add-ons to a building, which would probably not be sellable if the building were put to sale, but would cost a significant amount of money if the company had to purchase and install the add-ons in a new building. Sometimes, simply keeping the building for a period of time, and then taking the time to decide if the building will be needed again can make sense. If that period takes more than a few months it may be possible to lease it on a month-to-month basis during the interim.
- You need a storage space. Another reason for keeping a building might be that you have a need for storing equipment from all over the company. At times of reorganizations or consolidations, companies often end up with many pieces of equipment, which do not find an immediate home. Keeping a site to store the equipment can be an option. It might also be that the building in question already stores a substantial amount of equipment and parts. In this case, it might make sense to keep the building as a storage and avoid storage costs that would have occurred by leasing a storage space somewhere else. However, unless you have enough equipment in need of storage to fill the entire building, it often makes more sense to sell the building and lease a smaller site to store everything.
- You think the market in undervalued. This one is probably the most difficult option to evaluate. In this option, the reasoning to keep the building is that you think that at the current market prices, you would lose too much by selling the building now, so you think it makes more sense to lease it and can always decide to sell it later when the market gets better. This reasoning can be good if the site is clearly undervalued, but playing the market can be tricky if you do not do your homework. First, you will need to understand the market for your specific type of building. Some buildings can retain their market value more than others can. For example, standard office buildings in a city are relatively easy to evaluate. If you own an office building for which you no longer need, you can get an evaluation and see how much you could expect to get for the building. However, if you own a manufacturing site things can be a little different. For starters, many building owners make the mistake of considering their cost of the building when trying to come up with an asking price. An example of this is the manufacturer which built his production facility 10 years ago and invested in the installation of numerous add-ons (compressor lines, generator, havoc systems, electrical distribution, other) and looks at the building from a reconstruction cost perspective. Obviously, when these building owners get advice from their real estate broker as to how much they think they can sell the building for, they almost have hearth attacks because the broker knows that there is little chance to recuperate any of the add-ons when selling the building; therefore, the suggested sale price might be less than half the construction cost. Before you think that the market is undervalued and you could wait and sell your building in a few years when the market gets better, you need to consider the cost of keeping the building and include the building’s expenses as well as the opportunity cost of keeping it. The expenses are easy to calculate but do not limit yourself to normal maintenance. If you kept your building for a few years, will the roof need to be replaced? How about the heating systems? From an opportunity point of view, you need to consider that if you sold your building today, you could reinvest that money now. Finally, keep the building often means trying to lease it. Depending on the size of the building, can you find a single tenant or will you need to divide it? I wrote a blog on the cost of dividing a site and what to remember a while ago "Blog Name".
Related Articles:Plan Your Restorations in Advance The Commercial Lease That Kept Me Up at Night How to Plan out Your Real Estate Capital Expenses over the Years - Part I Conducting Lifecycle Cost in Order to Make Better Decisions Energy Saving – The Consultant and the Client Point of View
You might also like:Raise the red flag fast when a capital expense project starts to go in the wrong direction The Fine Line Between Normal and Capital Expenses Save Money for Your Company, and Save the World at the Same Time How to Find a Good Real Estate Site for Your Stakeholders Watch the Small Details